Is ChatGPT the future of cheating or the future of teaching?

Story Highlights
  • Some experts argue that the chatbot can be a beneficial educational tool.
Share via:

ChatGPT, the cutting-edge chatbot from OpenAI that was released in November 2022, can solve math equations, write a history term paper, compose a sonnet and almost everything in between.

So it’s not surprising that many educators support banning the chatbot in schools to prevent plagiarism, cheating and just plain inaccuracy.

In response to these concerns, some major districts have banned the chatbot in schools. In December, the Los Angeles Unified School District “preemptively” blocked access to ChatGPT while “a risk/benefit assessment is conducted,” a district spokesperson told the Washington Post.

And in January, New York City Public Schools banned access to ChatGPT from devices and networks that the school owns, per the Washington Post.

A spokesperson for the NYC Department of Education told Chalkbeat that the decision was made “due to concerns about negative impacts on student learning and concerns regarding the safety and accuracy of content.”

But not everyone is on board with a complete ban — some in the education world say instead of banning it, teach kids how to use it smartly and fairly, and it could be a beneficial educational tool.

One thing that experts do agree on: Don’t just ignore it.

“ChatGPT is just one more piece in the puzzle that’s accelerating change in terms of teaching and education,” said Trevor MacKenzie, an English teacher in Victoria, Canada.

The biggest issue with ChatGPT: cheating

ChatGPT is the leading edge of a new wave of chatbots based on so-called generative language models. They are trained on large sample sets of writing, and their writing is much more structurally complex than previous generations of bots.

The chatbot is so good at creating human-like responses that Alex Lawrence, professor at Weber State University, described it as “the greatest cheating tool ever invented,” the Wall Street Journal reported.

The concern from some teachers is that they may not be able to differentiate between a student’s work and the work of ChatGPT.

It would seem like the concern is warranted. As CNN reported, ChatGPT is powerful enough to have passed law exams in four courses at the University of Minnesota and a test at the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business.

It’s worth noting, though, that it does sometimes stumble too. ChatGPT’s attempt at “basic equations of rocketry,” for example, was unsuccessful, NPR reported.

And according to survey data from of 1000 students aged 18 and up, more than 89 percent of students who responded said they had used ChatGPT to help with a homework assignment, 48 percent admitted they had used it for an at-home test, and 53 percent had used it to write an essay.

Teachers faced a similar issue when Wikipedia was introduced. The fear, then, like the fear now, is that students would plagiarize information from Wikipedia instead of sourcing the information themselves.

Unlike Wikipedia, there is no source attribution with ChatGPT, which presents another issue.

One of the most worrying things about ChatGPT, according to Nadav Ziv, research affiliate with the Stanford History Education Group, is that it produces information without citing sources.

He described it as “free-standing information,” or information that isn’t attributable to a source.

As a test, Ziv asked ChatGPT to write an essay on the causes of the American Revolution, which it did, but there were no sources attached to the information.

History can be subjective with scholarly disagreement, so the worry, he said, is that without attribution, students might treat the information as fact without taking into consideration how the source can impact credibility.

An inevitable part of the future

Ziv believes that banning ChatGPT, like banning Google or any resource online, is almost impossible to do.

It’s not only that students will continue to use these resources with or without a ban, but it’s actually important that students know how to safely engage with technology like ChatGPT.

“I think it’s more about preparing students to safely and effectively engage with ChatGPT,” he said, “understand its limitations, understand its opportunities.”

Yotam Ophir, professor of communication at the University at Buffalo, pointed out a recurring pattern with the introduction of new technology: Every time a new technology is introduced, we find ourselves struggling with how it forces people to rethink the things they do.

The best comparison, he said, is calculators, which, like ChatGPT, many found threatening to education. The worry, he explained, was about the possibility of calculators and statistical software eventually replacing mathematicians.

The introduction of these new technologies, he said, can be disruptive in nature and spark a rethinking of values, which is sometimes necessary.

“ChatGPT will be a part of their [students’] lives,” he said. “There is no going back.”


  1. LATEST Entry-Level Jobs in SA
  2. LATEST Internships & Learnerships in SA
  3. LATEST Bursaries in SA
  4. LATEST Career Tips & Resources
  5. LATEST Grants & Funding 
  6. LATEST Contests around Africa
  7. LATEST News and MORE!

  • Join our Telegram channel so you’ll never miss an opportunity. Simply CLICK HERE, and you’re in!

Share via:

Scholarly Africa

Scholarly Africa is a hub where South Africa's youth meet a world of opportunities to excel in their career path. Every single hour, our team of dedicated career coaches are sifting through loads of careers, jobs and educational opportunities to deliver the best content, just for you.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
error: Sorry, but you may not copy content on